Cubase vs reaper midi how to#

If you I doing midi mostly, I might lean more Cubase. Most of the advanced functions in Cubase, I rarely used and would end up spending more time reading the manual that it would have taken just doing it by hand. Reapers used to be not great but they have added a lot over the years, and is plenty good for what I do. I started on Cubase 1.01, right after it was ported over to PC and was MIDI only.Ĭubase at that time still had better midi functions that Reaper has now, in my opinion. I switched to Reaper probably 15 years ago, after using Cubase for 10.

At this point, I don't even have the heart to tell him he could have had it all for $60, while he constantly runs into roadblocks I don't have (but which could be 'fixed' on PT by spending more money).īesides, I'm a cheapskate and even Elements costs 50% more than fully-functioning Reaper. He spent $$$ on PT, figuring that if he spent enough he'd have all the capability he'd ever need. 'I wonder if anyone sells a phone app that would let me control transport from my phone?' One minute later I find out it's already built into the DAW.ĭon't fall into the trap a friend recently fell into when he decided to get back into home recording.

Cubase vs reaper midi how to#

Even after all these years, I still find myself wondering how to do some obscure thing, go online and find out that everything I need is built in. The downside is that it can be overwhelming at first, but there are plenty of YouTube videos to explain everything. The problem with scaled-down anything is that even if you get 95% of the capabilities, eventually that other 5% includes exactly what you want to do. I started with Cakewalk and stuck with it through its transition to Sonar (back when it was very expensive) before switching.